Dashboard →
HIGHDIPLOMATIC

France and Italy open direct talks with Iran on Hormuz safe passage — bypassing US-Israel campaign

·Paris / Rome / Tehran

France and Italy have opened direct diplomatic talks with Tehran to negotiate guaranteed safe passage for their ships through the Strait of Hormuz, the Financial Times reported on Saturday citing three people familiar with the matter. The European initiative is independent of the US-Israeli military campaign and reflects growing European alarm at the economic impact of Hormuz disruption on their energy supplies. The move signals a deepening split between continental European states and the US-UK-Israel operational axis.

France and Italy have opened separate diplomatic channels with Tehran seeking a bilateral arrangement to guarantee safe passage for their flagged vessels through the Strait of Hormuz, the Financial Times reported Saturday, citing three people familiar with the discussions. European countries are exploring diplomatic solutions as they seek to ensure continued export of oil and gas from the Middle East and prevent further disruption to global energy supplies. The initiative is significant on multiple levels. First, it represents Europe acting independently of the United States on a core military-diplomatic question of the war — seeking bilateral arrangement with Iran rather than joining the US posture of pressuring Iran militarily to reopen Hormuz. Second, it implies that France and Italy believe Iran is capable of and willing to offer selective passage guarantees — potentially as leverage in the broader conflict. France has already suffered its first combat casualty in the war (CWO Arnaud Frion, killed in Erbil) and has been among the most vocal European states calling for de-escalation. Italy has significant energy dependence on Gulf LNG supplies. Switzerland has refused US military overflight requests. The broader picture is of continental Europe increasingly distancing itself from the US-Israeli campaign and seeking its own off-ramps. Iran has every incentive to accept bilateral European passage arrangements: it would fragment Western unity, generate revenue from European energy trade, and demonstrate that Iran can offer targeted concessions without yielding to US military pressure. The development adds diplomatic complexity to the coercive architecture Trump built around the Kharg Island strike.

Actor responses

NATONEUTRALCLAIM

France and Italy are pursuing diplomatic channels to protect European energy interests. NATO members retain sovereign rights to conduct their own diplomacy with third parties. European security requires both military readiness and diplomatic engagement.

IranSUPPORTINGRESPONSE

Iran has always been open to dialogue with European states on matters of mutual interest. Safe passage discussions reflect the legitimate concerns of countries that have been drawn into this conflict by American aggression.

United StatesOPPOSINGRESPONSE

The United States expects its European allies and partners to present a unified front. Bilateral arrangements with Iran that circumvent coordinated pressure undermine the broader effort to restore freedom of navigation through the Strait of Hormuz.

IRGCSUPPORTINGRESPONSE

European nations are wise to seek direct arrangements with Iran. Those who respect Iranian sovereignty and interests will find Iran a reliable partner. Those who support aggression against Iran will face consequences.